Course Design and Review
The Instructional Design & Technology team provides both individual and group support for all adjunct and full-time faculty members. IDT workshops, trainings, and individual consultation sessions provide opportunities for faculty to discuss ideas and expectations for developing a face to face, hybrid, or online course. Our main mission is to support PWSC faculty in creating engaging courses that maximize student success.
Consultation Topics
Some of the instructional design topics we can assist with include:
- Creating a syllabus using the PWSC template
- Guiding faculty through the steps of course development
- Assisting faculty to identify learning objectives
- Advising on how to match instructional strategies to learning objectives
- Helping faculty develop assignments that increase student engagement
- Providing consistent, detailed responses to faculty content development needs
- Designing and uploading the course components to Blackboard
- Providing technical expertise on the presentation of course content and activities
- Personalizing and maintaining a course gradebook in Blackboard
- Recommending appropriate technologies to enhance instruction and learning activities
- Ensuring that the overall design requirements are carried through to the entire course website
Our course development consultations follow the most recent research for effective learning and best practices in education. Course reviews are based on guidance from researched-based industry leader Quality Matters.
Please note that our instructional designers work in a strictly consultative role; instructors retain full control of the course they develop.
For programs, IDT can provide guidance to directors and administrators about program development, design, and delivery strategies. With increasing competition in the online space, ensuring a predictable and user-friendly experience in courses is essential to student retention and satisfaction, which can increase overall program reputation. Instructional designers iat PWSC can help programs with the following:
- Reviewing courses for consistency and quality
- Building orientations and/or support materials for students
- Developing course templates that can be imported into all courses within a program
- Customizing the look of courses or program templates in Sakai
- Providing program-specific faculty development opportunities
Adjunct Faculty
Prince William Sound College values its part-time adjunct faculty. In 2019, PWSC launched the Adjunct Faculty Levels Engagement Program to provide recognition for adjunct faculty who have demonstrated commitment to course excellence and student success. Excellence in course design is demonstrated through meeting a set of pre-established criteria, largely based on the Quality Matters program.
Adjunct who meet the criteria are compensated with a $100 per-credit hour increase in pay per level completed. All levels are applicable for both online and live classes. (Live classes are required to have a Blackboard shell).
To request a course review, adjunct faculty should:
- Complete a self-review using the Course Review Tool (Link will open a view-only file. To create an editable copy, select File>Make a Copy)
- Submit a formal Course Review Request, with completed self-review attached
Full-Time Faculty
Though full-time faculty are not eligible for a compensation increase based on the Adjunct Faculty Levels Engagement Program, all instructors are encouraged to participate if interested.
Additionally, the IDT team can provide information and consultation pertaining to a more thorough and nationally-recognized course review process through Quality Matters. The University of Alaska Anchorage does provide several mini-grants to UAA-connected professors who pursue Quality Matters course certification. Contact the PWSC IDT team or navigate to the UAA Quality Matters webpage for more information.
DIY Course Design Information
The primary purpose of a syllabus is to communicate to your students what the course is about, why it is taught, where it is going, and what will be required for them to complete the course with a passing grade.
The PWSC Instructional Design and Technology team has created a syllabus template for faculty to use and adapt. Our syllabus template makes your work easier! The template is ADA accessible and includes University of Alaska policy statements that work for all courses.
This template was revised in 2020 to clarify areas for faculty adaptation and simplify ADA-compatible table formatting. Additionally, high-interest and most-commonly accessed information for students (such as course schedule and assignments) were moved towards the beginning of the template.
For the document to remain ADA accessible during the editing process, instructors must adjust information using specific heading styling. Check out the tutorial below for a clear, how-to guide on customizing the syllabus to your course!
Learning Objectives
Learning objectives describe the measurable knowledge, skills, or abilities that students should be able to demonstrate as a result of a completing a course. They are student-centered rather than instructor-centered, in that they describe what the students will do, not what the instructor will teach.
Introduction
Learning objectives are not standalone statements. They must all relate to each other, the content, and the course activities.
Articulating learning objectives for students is a best practice in education. When an instructor explicitly tells students what is expected for them to know and do (and are given aligned practice opportunities), students are more likely to succeed on a test or major assignment. That is to say, they will have learned what they needed to know in order to prove mastery of course content. If students are not told what they will be expected to do, then they are left guessing.
Why Learning Objectives?
Learning objectives help faculty to:
- Decide emphasis in the course: Of all the things we could teach, what should we teach?
- Decide how best to teach: Teaching students to analyze requires different teaching approaches from teaching students to memorize.
- Decide how best to assess learning: Do I need a project, a performance assessment, or a final exam?
- Communicate expectations to students: What are our decisions on the matters above?
Learning objectives help students to:
- Create a connection between teaching and learning, between professors and students.
- Take much of the guessing out of the learning process.
- Truly master the content of the course.
Learning objectives need to be SMART.
- Specific: The learning objective should be well defined and clear. It states exactly what will be accomplished.
- Measurable: The learning objective should provide a benchmark or target so that the institution can determine when the target has been reached, by how much it has been exceeded, or by how much it has fallen short.
- Attainable: Learning objectives can be achieved based on current skill, available resources, and area of study. Learning outcomes should neither be easy nor impossible to attain, but somewhere in between.
- Relevant: Learning objectives should apply to the course content and relate to an important discipline-specific concept.
- Time-Framed: A learning objective should include a specific date by which it will be completed. It is important to allow enough time to successfully implement the steps needed to achieve the objective, but not so much as to elicit procrastination.
Writing a Learning Objective Statement
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy provides the framework for writing course and unit level learning objectives. Each learning objective is represented by a sentence that consists of an action verb related to a cognitive process and a clearly defined content related to a specific knowledge type.
All learning outcomes have a common format: Subject Verb Object.
- Subject
The SUBJECT of the learning outcome statement is the student or the learner.
Example: Students will __________.
- Verb
Each VERB in a learning outcome statement represents a cognitive process. Ask yourself: How will my students show what they learned?
Learning outcomes should consider the different types of cognitive processes involved in knowledge retention and transfer. Bloom's Revised Taxonomy is a well-known framework that can provide clarity to this process.
The Cognitive Process Dimension Bloom's Definition Verbs
Remember
Exhibit memory of previously learned material by recalling facts, terms, basic concepts, and answers. choose, define, detail, find, label, list, match, recall, select, show
Understand Demonstrate understanding of facts and ideas by organizing, comparing, translating, interpreting, giving descriptions, and stating main ideas. classify, compare. contrast, demonstrate, explain, extend, illustrate, infer, interpret, outline, paraphrase, relate, summarize, translate
Apply Solve problems to new situations by applying acquired knowledge, facts, techniques and rules in a different way. apply, choose, execute, implement, model, organize, plan, solve
Analyze Examine and break information into parts by identifying motives or causes. Make inferences and find evidence to support generalizations. analyze, categorize , classify, compare, contrast, deconstruct, dissect, divide, examine, inspect, organize, simplify
Evaluate Present and defend opinions by making judgments about information, validity of ideas, or quality of work based on a set of criteria. appriase, assess, criticize, defend, determine, disprove, detect, evaluate, judge, justify, measure, prove, rate, support
Create Compile information together in a different way by combining elements in a new pattern or proposing alternative solutions. adapt, build, combine, compile, compose, construct, design, develop, generate, hypothesize, improve, invent, modify, plan, produce
- Object
The OBJECT of the learning outcome statement is derived most often from the course content. Ask yourself: what do I want my students to learn?
The course content can be linked to four general types of knowledge: Factual, Conceptual, Procedural, and Metacognitive. The table below explains these knowledge dimensions along with their specific subtypes and provides examples for each one.
The Knowledge Dimension Factual Conceptual Procedural Metacognitive - Knowledge of terminology
- Knowledge of specific details and elements
- Knowledge of classifications and categories
- Knowledge of principales and generalizations
- Knowledge of theories, models, and structures
- Knowledge of subject-specific skills and algorithms
- Knowledge of subject-specific techniques and methods
- Knowledge of criteria for determining when to use appropriate procedures
- Strategic knowledge
- Knowledge about cognitive tasks, including appropriate contextual and conditional knowledge
- Self-knowledge
Bloom's Revised Taxonomy brings the cognitive process dimensions and the knowledge dimensions together to form a more complete, specific learning objective.
To view a grid of this intersection, review the responsive version of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Model from Iowa State University.
All learning objective information was adapted from A Taxonomy for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment:
Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.
Additional Resources
Learning Outcomes Taxonomy Table (Center for Teaching Excellence, University of South Carolina)
A Model of Learning Objectives (Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, Iowa State University)